The Great Alcatraz Escape

By Michael DeLuca, ’29

Staff Writer

I’m sure you have heard of Alcatraz, aka “The Rock;” a prison where the worst of the worst were sent; a prison located on an island in the middle of the fast-moving, freezing-cold San Francisco Bay; a prison that was made to be inescapable. Well, maybe inescapable is the wrong word.
One night on June 11, 1962, brilliant mastermind Frank Morris and brothers John and Clarence Anglin were able to do the impossible: escape Alcatraz. But how did they do it? And what happened after they did?

Background
 
First built as a fortress and military prison in the 1850s, Alcatraz became a federal maximum-security prison in 1934. The 22-acre island prison housed notorious criminals like gangster Al Capone before closing in 1963 because it was too expensive to maintain. The surrounding saltwater was corrosive to the prison’s concrete walls. While open, it was the site of more than a dozen unsuccessful escape attempts, with most prisoners stymied by the remote location about 1.5 miles from the closest land.

Morris, born on September 1, 1926, arrived at Alcatraz in January of 1960. He was sent there for a 14-year sentence after being convicted of bank robbery. Prior to his time at Alcatraz, Morris was able to escape multiple other prisons as he was highly intelligent and very resourceful. Shortly after Morris’ arrival, John Anglin was transferred to Alcatraz. Born on May 2, 1930, Morris was serving a 35-year sentence for bank robbery. A few months later, in January of 1961, John Anglin’s brother, Clarence, joined them. Born May 11, 1931, Clarence Anglin faced a 15-year sentence for bank robbery and multiple prison escape attempts. There was another prisoner, Allen West, born March 25, 1929, who was involved in the escape, but his attempt was unsuccessful. The four men all knew each other from other prisons. They were conveniently in adjoining cells and could communicate regularly and plan their escape.

Frank Morris, Clarence Anglin, John Anglin

The Preparation
 
So exactly how did they escape their cells? Well, each prison cell had a small vent at the bottom of the back wall. The men came up with the idea to pry out the vent, and widen the preexisting hole, as the normal hole was way too small for any of them to fit through. At night, the gang used modified spoons and a homemade drill made from a vacuum cleaner motor to slowly chisel away at the wall around the hole. As you can imagine, they didn’t want anyone to notice what they were doing or hear their digging. Morris came up with an idea.  Every night from 5:30 to 7, the prisoners had music hour, so during this time one of the men would loudly play an accordion to cover up the noise. Another man would keep watch to make sure that no guards noticed anything. This indeed worked and after several months each man had successfully carved out a big enough hole for him to climb through. 

Due to the routine room inspections done on the prisoners’ cells, the gang needed a way to cover up the holes they were making. They stole paint from the art room and used cardboard, soap and notebook covers to make a fake wall that perfectly matched the vents they carved out.  The result was brilliant, and the guards never suspected a thing.

The fake wall used to cover the hole behind the vent

On the other side of the vent, within the prison wall, was a very small corridor where there were numerous pipes. The pipes acted as ladders for the men to climb up and led to an area above the cells. This is where the men planned on doing all of their work to escape and store their materials.  The only problem was the entire front half of the area had cell bars on it, making it visible to any guard. So what would they do? Well, Morris only knew about this spot because he had a job painting the ceilings and sweeping the floors there. He was able to maneuver a plan to cover the bars with blankets in order to hide their work.  Morris came up with the clever idea that every time he would sweep there, he would sweep some of the dust out the cell bars and onto the guards’ polished hallway below. When the guards started complaining of the mess, he suggested the solution to cover the bars with blankets so the dust couldn’t fall through. Morris did this job as slowly as possible so the guards would keep the blankets up there until the day the gang could finally escape. Every time the men would climb up, they would have to make as little noise as possible, as any tiny noise would echo throughout the entire cell block, alarming the guards. But the men were very skilled and did not make any loud noises, and the guards never caught them.  

Every night, a guard would walk the cell block hall to check in each cell to make sure nobody was out of bed.  If a guard walked past the cells of Morris, West, and the Anglin brothers and saw that they weren’t there, an alarm would be triggered and a search would begin. That is where possibly the most genius part of this whole escape comes into play. The four men crafted fake heads using a combination of soap, toilet paper, concrete dust, toothpaste and paint, again stolen from the art room, to make highly realistic heads that matched their own.  They would put the fake heads in their beds and make it appear that the men were sleeping.  For the hair of the heads, they used real human hair. One of the Anglin brothers had a job at the prison barber shop and would secretly collect the fallen hair to put on the fake heads. The heads took months of hard work, and the result was astonishing.

The fake heads created to fool guards doing cell checks.

Finally, the men had to find a way to overcome the hardest part of their escape, traveling across the fast-moving, freezing-cold San Francisco Bay. Now you know that Morris was highly intelligent, so he researched sea survival books from the prison library. Morris looked into how life vests were made, and he came up with the idea to steal multiple rain coats, and glue them together to create life vests and a raft. The men ended up stealing over 50 rain coats and glued them together using waterproof glue that indeed made life vests and a raft! But they needed a way to inflate them. Remember the accordion from earlier? They modified it, transforming it into a homemade pump. As the final detail, the men built simple paddles using plywood and screws. 

One of the life vests made from stolen rain coats

The Escape

The day had finally come for the four men to escape, June 11, 1962. But the men did not just pick any random day. You see, the San Francisco Bay current was highly unpredictable and would not just take the men to shore every day. If they weren’t careful, the current could bring the men anywhere in the ocean. But Frank Morris knew this. He again used the books in the library to study the current and figure out the perfect day that the current would bring them directly to shore, and that day, he figured out, was June 11. But it would still be challenging. 

So the night had come, the guards had called “lights out” and it was the time for the men to escape. Each man took out their fake head and positioned it in their bed to make it appear that they were asleep. Then they took out their fake vent to escape their cell. Remember earlier how I said Allen West was unable to escape? Well, this was because on the night of the escape, his vent got stuck and when he couldn’t remove it, Morris and the Anglin brothers left him behind. The three men climbed up to the platform where they had been storing their materials and picked up their raft, life vests, and paddles. The men climbed to the roof of Alcatraz and scaled the prison walls, perfectly navigating them in a way that no guard towers would be able to spot them (Morris had been studying the outside of the prison for weeks to figure out the perfect route). Next, they climbed down the rocky island to the cold bay, put on their life vests, and then climbed into the raft and rowed away. They were finally free.

The Outcome

What happened next is unknown. Officials back then speculated that the three men drowned in the bay, but no bodies were ever found. The FBI eventually talked to West about the plan and he gave extensive information, getting time off his sentence for cooperating, but the information was not enough to figure out if the three men made it to shore. There were reported sightings of the men in the years after, and rumors they made it to South America, but none of that was ever confirmed. So what do you think? Do you think they drowned in the bay or froze to death? Or do you believe they made it to freedom? If anyone were to successfully complete an escape from The Impenetrable Rock, it would definitely be the Anglin brothers, and the brilliant mastermind, Frank Morris. 

The History of Christmas Traditions

By Gabriella DeLuca, ’27

Staff Writer

Christmas—the holiday of evergreen trees, gift giving, Santa Claus, and carols—is a celebration that captures both the beauty of winter and the joy of being with the ones you love. Celebrated around the world, from countries ranging from the United States to Germany, Christmas traditions are truly a hallmark of the winter season. But where did these beloved holiday traditions come from? And why do we still celebrate them today?

The origins of Christmas are intertwined with various religious and cultural traditions from around the world. In the Christian faith, Christmas is the celebration of the birth of Jesus and his bringing of salvation, hope, and love to earth. Christmas also coincides with the winter solstice and incorporates pre-Christian traditions, some that date back as far as two millennia.

December 25th aligns closely with earlier pagan holidays, particularly the Roman celebration of Saturnalia, which likely influenced the development of many Christmas traditions that are still celebrated today. Saturnalia, observed between December 17th and 24th, was a celebration of the winter solstice practiced by the pagans (polytheistic Romans) to honor the sun god, Saturn. Romans believed that the cold season was a sign that the sun had grown ill and weak, and that the lengthening of daylight that began after the winter solstice symbolized its gradual recovery and eventual return of springtime. During this Roman festival, all social hierarchies were overturned and the pagans throughout Ancient Rome came together to celebrate the winter solstice. This celebration was characterized by feasting and gift-giving, customs that strongly resemble modern Christmas traditions. The gifts exchanged and the foods shared symbolized hope for a prosperous spring harvest in the coming year.

How To Celebrate Saturnalia Like A Roman | DigVentures
A typical Saturnalia feast celebrated with food, drinks, games, and conversation.

Another festival that inspired the modern Christmas traditions was Yule. Yule was a celebration of the winter solstice and renewal of light, similar to the pagan festival of Saturnalia. This 12-day celebration is believed to be one of the oldest winter solstice festivals in history with origins tracing back to the Norse and German people of northern Europe. One of the hallmarks of this festival was the burning of the Yule log, a celebration that is still popular in Europe today, although in a different form. The original Yule log was an entire tree trunk that was burned for 12 days to welcome the return of the sun and the rebirth of light. The burning of the log was believed to symbolize the cleansing of the old year’s hardships and good fortune for the spring ahead. Today, in France and other countries in Europe, it is a common practice to bake a roulade-style cake decorated with berries and holly to look like an ancient Yule log.

The ancient tradition of Yule Log at Christmas ~ – RANDOM Times •
The burning of the ancient Yule Log during the twelve-day Yule celebration.

Christmas Traditions

Today we celebrate Christmas by decorating Christmas trees, writing letters to Santa, singing carols, and decorating our homes with mistletoe and holly, traditions reminesent of those practiced by people many centuries ago.

Christmas Trees

Pagans were the first to use evergreen trees and plants to decorate their homes and brighten spirits during the winter solstice. Evergreen was believed to represent fertility and a new life amidst the darkness of winter. Decorating their doors and windows with evergreen boughs reminded the Romans of the green plants that would grow again when summer returned and the sun regained its strength. The Ancient Egyptians also filled their homes with green palms and papyrus reeds during their mild winter season to symbolize the triumph of life over death.

The modern decorated Christmas tree began as a German tradition and was first brought into the home during the 16th century. The Germans, Romans, and Celts brought greenery indoors during the winter to encourage the return of the sun during the dark winter months. This practice was spread across the Atlantic Ocean and brought to the Americas during the 18th century by German soldiers during the Revolutionary War.

It is widely believed that the 16th-century Protestant reformer, Martin Luther, was the first to add lighted candles to a tree. Stories suggest that while walking home one winter evening, Luther was amazed by the sight of the stars twinkling among the evergreen trees. To replicate the scene for his family, Luther brought a tree into his house and decorated its branches with lighted candles.

The modern decorated Christmas tree and the popularity of this tradition has been linked to a 19th century illustration of Queen Victoria and the British royal family standing with their Christmas tree during the winter season. This image, sketched in the Illustrated London, significantly boosted the popularity of the Christmas tree and led to the further spread of the tradition.

Where Did Christmas Trees Come From? - How Queen Victoria & Prince Albert  Made a Holiday Tradition
1848 illustration of Queen Victoria and German Prince, Albert, standing with their family around a decorated Christmas tree.

The Legend of Santa Claus

It would be hard to imagine Christmas without Santa Claus. During the winter season, the image of Santa Claus can be seen almost anywhere, from Coca-Cola bottles, to real-life experiences where children can meet Santa and tell him their Christmas wishes.

Today, Santa Claus is thought of as the jolly old man in a red suit with a white beard who brings toys to all the good children on Christmas Eve. However, the story of Santa Claus can be traced back hundreds of years to a monk named St. Nicholas, known for his generosity and gift-giving. During the 4th Century in modern-day Turkey, St. Nicholas dedicated his life to helping the poor and the sick, giving away all his inherited wealth to those in need. Over the course of many years, St. Nicholas became recognized as the most popular saint in Europe and known worldwide as the protector of children. Today, St. Nicholas is celebrated with a feast on December 6th, the anniversary of his death.

Victorian Santa: 10 High Res Watercolor Jpgs, Junk Journaling, Scrapbook,  Crafts, Card Making, Digital Art, Christmas, Vintage Christmas - Etsy
Common depiction of the modern Santa Claus.

Mistletoe & Holly

Decorating with mistletoe and holly is a well-known holiday tradition, but did you know that these plants’ history dates back hundreds of years?

Holly was a sacred plant for the pagans as they associated it with Saturn, the god of the sun and agriculture. During Saturnalia, the pagans would exchange wreaths made from holly for good luck. Over time, the practice of decorating with holly became a tradition, and even today homes around the world are often seen decked out with greenery during the Christmas season.

Have you ever wondered where the tradition of kissing under the mistletoe stemmed from?

There are many theories to the origin of this holiday tradition. The ancient Greeks and Romans believed mistletoe to have healing powers, curing everything from ailments such as epilepsy to poisoning. The Greeks and Romans also used mistletoe as a symbol of peace, reconciling with their enemies under it to symbolize to the end of warfare.

The tradition of kissing under the mistletoe is also commonly traced back to Norse mythology. According to an ancient myth, the god Baldur was prophesied to die an untimely death, prompting his mother Frigg, the goddess of love, to seek protection for him. She traveled throughout the natural world, and secured promises with all the plants and animals to not harm her son. However, Frigg forgot to secure an oath from mistletoe, causing Baldur to be invulnerable to all living things with the exception of mistletoe. With knowledge of this vulnerability, Loki, the god of mischief, was able to kill Baldur using an arrow made from mistletoe. In some versions of this legend, the gods later restored Baldur to life, and in her great delight, Frigg declared mistletoe a symbol of love and vowed to bestow a kiss upon all those who passed beneath it.

Adding to the mythology, this one-of-a-kind Christmas tradition is often credited to Washington Irving, a notable American author who wrote about the tradition of kissing under the mistletoe in his acclaimed novel, The Sketch Book. Eventually this tradition became a romantic custom of the Christmas holiday.

Kiss me sweetheart! A brief history of mistletoe. - Gastown
Kissing under the Mistletoe became popularized during the Victorian Era in England.

Exploring the history behind Christmas reveals a rich tapestry of culture and stories that have evolved over time. Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, or any other holiday, the traditions we practice today are woven together from centuries of history, offering diverse ways to celebrate life, light, and being with the ones you love.

Going Back to Childhood With Goosebumps

By Abby Lynch, ’29

Staff Writer

I bet that most people have read R.L. Stine’s Goosebumps by the time they’ve gotten to high school, but I don’t think you’re ever too old for them. Stine wrote the original 62 books in the series in the 1990s. But since then, the series has been re-issued, spun off and made into movies countless times. They’re the first scary stories for many children, and even fun to read when you’re older — and harder to scare. Here are a few of the books that I’ve read recently:

Diary of a Dummy: This book was a fun adventure to read. It involved Slappy, the evil ventriloquist’s dummy found in many stories, and two other characters. The other characters found Slappy’s Diary which contained the dummy’s different thoughts. The diary also had clues to find a treasure of gold. The book showed Slappy in a better light than previous books he has been in, which might make readers see him a little differently. Overall the book was really good.

Bride of the Living Dummy: This was a really funny read. The book is about Slappy finding a supposed love, so instead of one dummy making trouble for the main characters, it’s an evil doll and a dummy. I really liked reading this book because it showed what happens to Slappy’s victims when he wins. There were also many funny interactions between characters both bad and good.

Slappy’s Tales of Horror (graphic novel): This book has multiple stories including some of the classics like Night of the Living Dummy, The Werewolf of Fever Swamp, A Shocker on Shock Street, and Ghost Beach. This was also a fun read since I actually got to see some of the characters from classic Goosebumps. After every story, Slappy talked to the reader, acting like a funny, but scary friend.

Slappy, Beware!: This book was interesting to read because it explained some of Slappy’s backstory. One surprising thing about this story is that Slappy lost, even though in most of the stories he usually wins. It was a great read and learning about Slappy’s backstory was really fun.

Why Federal Cuts Could Change The Face of Education

The Department of Education is at risk of being dismantled after the President signed a March executive order to reduce national debt and limit federal overbearance on schooling. Following this action, the Supreme Court allowed the current administration to fire more than 1,000 government employees – half the department’s workforce. The Department of Education is responsible for billions of dollars in student loans and funding for public schools, which allows millions of American students to get their education. The department also enforces civil rights laws that protect many vulnerable students. What will the future look like for students?

“We are going to be returning education, very simply, back to the states, where it belongs…”

President Donald Trump, Executive Order 14242, “Improving Education Outcomes by Empowering Parents, States, and Communities”

The President claims eliminating the Department of Education will not take away from “K-12 students, students with special needs, college student borrowers, and others who rely on essential programs.” However, according to the executive order, quite the contrary will happen: those involved with the department will continue their affairs as usual, but educational authority will be restored to the states. The department costs more than $10 million per year to run, according to President Trump, an egregious amount for an office that “does not educate anyone.” In addition, he points to reading and math scores which he claims are near historic lows across America, with over 70 percent of 8th graders nationwide below proficient. This is further proof, the President argues, that the current federal Department of Education is not working.

But the department manages a significant amount of money, including $1.6 trillion in student loan debt. President Trump claims the loans will simply be managed by another federal department: Treasury, Commerce or the Small Business Administration. Critics of the plan fear there will be delays or disruptions to loans that will interrupt or terminate borrowers’ educational plans. And the department is responsible for enforcing civil rights laws in federally funded schools, including anti-discrimination laws protecting vulnerable populations. Just this month, according to the Associated Press, officials have had to rehire dozens of workers from the department’s Office for Civil Rights to handle a backlog of discrimination complaints (more than 200 were laid off in the spring). How will these matters be processed without the federal department? In addition, the department funds special education services for students with disabilities and foreign-born residents, including immigrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and more. This helps all parties receive an individualized education suited to their needs. Critics of the executive order argue that eliminating the department will affect the quality and equality of education.

According to conservatives, there is a trend of “indoctrination” of liberal ideologies within the American education system. For example, there is significant public backlash against alleged incorporation of subjective topics into college curricula, such as a professor’s personal take on the current administration, how they believe politics could be improved, and criticism of viewpoints that are not their own. This perceived agenda in an educational environment is a significant motivator for Trump’s executive order to eliminate the department as a sort of reform and reprimand. But by taking away the department, significant funding for public schools disappears, along with legal protections, and that loss negatively affects teachers and students alike.

Despite President Trump’s executive order, Congress would need to approve the elimination of the department, and that would require the cooperation of Democratic lawmakers in addition to proponents of Trump. Many Americans wonder whether it is likely that such a bill could pass, and there are potential constitutional and moral concerns from both sides. Multiple federal laws relating to education, such as those protecting people with disabilities, would need to be reevaluated to ensure no federal authority is breached in this process. Teachers unions, parent groups and other education advocates are fighting the move in court.

Many Americans continue to debate this issue and the implications of a future without the Department of Education: What does this mean for oversight of local educational agencies? What happens to federally funded educational programs? What about the billions in higher education grant funding? 

Works Cited

Babinski, Leslie. Policy 360 Episode 165 with Leslie Babinski. sanford.duke.edu/sites/default/files/165_Transcript_Leslie_Babinski.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct. 2025.

“Educational Resources for Immigrants, Refugees, Asylees and Other New Americans.” U.S. Department of Education, 2015, http://www.ed.gov/teaching-and-administration/supporting-students/educational-resources-for-immigrants-refugees-asylees-and-other-new-americans.

Faguy, Ana. “What Does the US Education Department Do – and Can Trump Truly Dismantle It?” BBC, 15 Nov. 2024, http://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79zxzj90nno.

“Improving Education Outcomes by Empowering Parents, States, and Communities.” Federal Register, 25 Mar. 2025, http://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/03/25/2025-05213/improving-education-outcomes-by-empowering-parents-states-and-communities.

Preede, Ken. “Abolishing the Department of Education: Can It Happen and How Would It Impact Schools?” Parkerpoe.com, 2024, http://www.parkerpoe.com/news/2024/12/abolishing-the-department-of-education-can-it-happen-1.

School, Sanford. “Explainer: What Dismantling the Department of Education Really Means [Podcast].” Sanford School of Public Policy, 24 Mar. 2025, sanford.duke.edu/story/explainer-what-dismantling-department-education-really-means-podcast/.

Trump, Donald. “Improving Education Outcomes by Empowering Parents, States, and Communities.” The White House, 20 Mar. 2025, http://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/improving-education-outcomes-by-empowering-parents-states-and-communities/.

U.S. Department of Education. “Statement on President Trump’s Executive Order to Return Power over Education to States and Local Communities.” U.S. Department of Education, 20 Mar. 2025, http://www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/statement-president-trumps-executive-order-return-power-over-education-states-and-local-communities.

Walker, Tim. “How Dismantling the Department of Education Would Harm Students | NEA.” Nea.org, National Education Association, 4 Feb. 2025, http://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/how-dismantling-department-education-would-harm-students.

Making Beautiful Music at MMEA Districts

By The Hawk Staff

Twelve Hanover High School musicians earned accolades at the MMEA Southeastern District auditions at King Philip High School in Wrentham on Nov. 22. These students will perform at the 2025-2026 Southeastern District Senior Festival at New Bedford High School on Jan. 9-10. Seven of the 12 were recommended for All-States.

Several students who auditioned had key roles in the HHS school musical, The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee, which ran Nov. 20-22. This meant that they performed in the musical Thursday and Friday nights, auditioned for Districts during the day Saturday, and then performed closing night of the play on Saturday night.

For Orchestra, Henrik Consilvio and Shirley Mancini, both sophomores, were recognized for violin. Senior Aine Scanlan earned honors for oboe. In Concert Band, judges honored junior Maria-Rita Silva for flute, sophomore Rory Toyoshima for alto saxophone, junior Rory O’Connor for trumpet, and junior Ronan Blum for trombone. For Treble Chorus, juniors Avery Porro and Emma Louko were recognized as altos. Earning honors in Mixed Chorus were junior Sophie Frattasio as an alto, sophomore Anna Dillon as a soprano, and junior Sam Frattasio as a bass.

The seven students recommended for All-States were Consilvio, Mancini, Scanlan, Silva, Blum, Porro and Dillon. They will audition for those ensembles in January alongside the top music students from the five districts of Massachusetts. If accepted at that audition, they will perform with students from across the state at the MMEA All-State Festival in March. 

The Massachusetts Music Educators Association is a statewide organization dedicated to supporting quality music programs and instruction

Immorality and Dangers of Vigilante Justice

By Billy Hersey, ’27

Editor in Chief

Vigilante justice, or taking the law into one’s own hands, has been happening in the United States since before its founding. When imagining what vigilante justice looks like, people may picture a headstrong hero that roots out corruption, but the only difference between a terrorist and vigilante is public opinion. For example, to a Patriot, the winning of the American Revolution was a triumph and celebration of freedom. However, to a Loyalist, the war was a disaster that caused the loss of their lands and their displacement to Canada.

Vigilante justice can cause harm to innocents. This was notably done by the Sons of Liberty in years before the Revolution when tax collectors were frequently tarred and feathered as an act of defiance against the British Crown. To be tarred and feathered was painful, humiliating, and often left people scarred or burned. Whether the actions of the Sons of Liberty were justified is left to the individual to decide, but at least in my opinion, innocent people should never be hurt for political gain.

Of course, rooting out corruption in society sounds great, but before acting, people need to consider all perspectives on the issue and the veracity of the information they read or hear on the subject. A lot of times, people who commit these acts are manipulated and turned radical by the podcasts, videos or social media from which they form their political opinions. In some cases, these people are also mentally unstable, which, when paired with propaganda, can heavily influence people toward making bad decisions. Though there certainly is corruption in the government, people need to trust in the courts and our justice system. All people are entitled to a fair trial in front of a jury; whether the defendant is guilty or not, to deny that right is a crime in itself. When vigilantes strike, they are acting as judge, jury, and executioner.

The most recent example of vigilante justice was the murder of Turning Point USA leader Charlie Kirk, who was shot to death during an appearance on a college campus in September. Kirk was a determined and strong debater who was credited with gathering support for conservatism among younger voters. Kirk swayed public opinion against abortion, gun control and countless other issues. Kirk’s opponents may point out that the legislation and ideas he preached appealed mostly to white men, causing more harm than good, especially to the detriment of women and minority groups. This leaves Kirk’s legacy uncertain; however, he was a vocal advocate of peaceful free speech and political debate who deserves respect for his courage to create change. Many people in both political parties said kind words on social media and emphasized the immorality of political violence, but others celebrated the actions of the clearly troubled shooter, who was arrested days later. Reactions to Kirk’s death were more evidence of the growing political divide in this country. Even if you don’t agree with what Kirk stood for, you should at least recognize he was human and didn’t deserve the death chosen for him.

The December 2024 murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson also begs the question of vigilante or murderer. Of course, most people would agree that murder is wrong, yet upon hearing of Thompson’s death, many celebrated. United Healthcare is notorious for having one of the highest percentages of claim denials among all health insurers. By denying claims for expensive but possibly life-saving care, critics argue, this corporate giant is indirectly responsible for the deaths of thousands. Though Thompson isn’t completely to blame for the company’s policy that seems to put profits over human lives, he could have tried to make change. As a CEO he certainly had some power to enact at least small reforms, but any change that would have hurt the company’s bottom line would have likely been vetoed by the company’s board. Still, that doesn’t excuse the actions of alleged shooter, who is awaiting trial. Killing one man doesn’t bring back all the people killed by claim denial. Premeditated murder and crimes in the heat of anger don’t bring justice. If people truly want to make lasting change they should confront corporate giants in the courts. If the alleged shooter had done this, Brian Thompson’s children would still have a father.

The attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 could be considered another example of people trying to take the law into their own hands. Armed, right-wing protestors gathered in front of the building after a rally by Donald Trump, the outgoing president at the time, who had been pushing the narrative that the 2020 election had been “stolen” and Joe Biden was not the rightful winner. Against overwhelming evidence and ballot recounts in multiple states, Trump and his supporters insisted the election had been stolen and their country was in danger. With Trump’s call to action in their ears, the protestors marched to the Capitol, where tensions quickly escalated and the rally turned to a riot. Police forces stationed at the Capitol to maintain peace were easily overwhelmed, and rioters entered, intent on harming members of Congress and disrupting the certification of Biden’s election. This event is largely regarded as a stain on American history, and the multitudes of people injured as well as the 10 people whose deaths were related to the attack are proof of the dangers of propaganda. Some, including President Trump and some Republican officials, still believe that there was election fraud and praise these domestic terrorists as heroes and true Americans.

Wherever you stand ideologically, vigilante justice must stop. Although the battle to change government policy can be long and riddled with opposition, we have systems in place to create change. People can petition their representatives or senators and they can peacefully protest. This type of violence only strengthens the determination of the opposition. Assassination attempts on President Trump and Charlie Kirk have only widened the ideological divide and furthered political polarization. One House representative, Marjorie Taylor Greene, has even expressed desire for a “national divorce” along party lines! Unfortunately, hatred between liberals and conservatives is strong, but one issue that should have bipartisan support is ending political violence. Silencing people over ideological disagreements is primitive and contradicts the values upon which this country was founded.

Works cited

BBC. “Capitol Riots Timeline: What Happened on 6 January 2021?” BBC News, 2 Aug. 2023, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56004916.

“Charlie Kirk’s Legacy Deserves No Mourning.” The Nation, 12 Sept. 2025, http://www.thenation.com/article/politics/charlie-kirk-assassination-maga/.

Dorning, Courtney, et al. “There’s Anger behind the Internet’s Reactions to the Death of UnitedHealthcare CEO.” NPR, 10 Dec. 2024, http://www.npr.org/2024/12/10/nx-s1-5223471/theres-anger-behind-the-internets-reactions-to-the-death-of-unitedhealthcare-ceo.

Huo Jingnan. “People Are Losing Jobs due to Social Media Posts about Charlie Kirk.” NPR, 13 Sept. 2025, http://www.npr.org/2025/09/13/nx-s1-5538476/charlie-kirk-jobs-target-social-media-critics-resign.

Klee, Miles. “UnitedHealth Is Sick of Everyone Complaining about Its Claim Denials.” Rolling Stone, 9 Feb. 2025, http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/unitedhealth-defends-image-claim-denials-mangione-thompson-1235259054/.

Maag, Christopher, et al. “UnitedHealthcare CEO Shooting: What We Know about Brian Thompson’s Killing.” The New York Times, 4 Dec. 2024, http://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/06/nyregion/unitedhealthcare-brian-thompson-shooting.html.

Maloy, Mark. “Tarring and Feathering.” American Battlefield Trust, 16 Mar. 2023, http://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/tarring-and-feathering.

Rattray, Kate. “Clio.” Clio, 8 Dec. 2024, http://www.clio.com/blog/procedural-justice/.

“Who Was Charlie Kirk? What We Know about the Shooting and the Suspect.” Al Jazeera, 11 Sept. 2025, http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/11/who-was-charlie-kirk-what-we-know-about-the-shooting-and-the-suspect.

Understanding Cognitive Biases

By Emma Hersey, ’29

Staff Writer

What are cognitive biases? Cognitive biases are mental shortcuts that lead to systematic errors, affecting or counteracting your inner rationale. Your brain can be overloaded with information, and to process that information faster, these shortcuts are used to come up with a quick response to what is being said. This can create misinterpretation or inaccurate conclusions and lead to flawed judgment, poor decision-making, and distorted perceptions of reality. The creators of the idea of cognitive biases are Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, who brought this idea to light in the 1970s. They also introduced the concept of heuristics, which induce immediate judgment that guides you to make irrational decisions.

The inability to make a good judgment on a subject is induced by fatigue, stress, and emotions, which are personal factors, but are also caused by cognitive biases. Cognitive biases play a part in flawed judgment because they cause the brain to process information too quickly. With the quick processing of information comes the capability to miss or overlook important factors that can affect your argument. For example, if you see a news article that several people have died from a plane crash, and it makes you not want to fly, you are exhibiting the availability heuristic. You take what you have just seen or learned, over weigh the probability of it happening, and let it generate fear, even though fewer planes crash, than those that do. The availability of information on plane crashes is, at the moment, more prevalent than information available on planes that have successful trips, causing you to believe crashes are more common than they are.

Anchoring is also one of the biases that can affect your judgment because it uses the first piece of information that you collect on someone, and refuses to acknowledge any change that occurs. If you are at a restaurant, for example, and see a $90 steak and then further down on the menu you see a $50 steak, you will rationalize the price of the $50 steak. In your mind, you will think that you are getting a cheap steak, when in reality, $50 for a steak is not cheap.

People make decisions every day, whether they are good or bad. “Should I eat pizza or burgers tonight?” is a decision that doesn’t have any consequences. But deciding not to do something after someone asks you to, does. That kind of decision, when you prefer to do the opposite of what someone is trying to make you do is called reactance. This tricks the brain into thinking there is a loss of freedom or a forced action. This gives you a sense of need to rebel against the enforcer to regain your control over what you do, causing you to not do what is asked of you, resulting in punishment. For instance, if your parents tell you to put on a jacket when it is cold outside, it may make you not want to wear one because you are being forced to instead of making the choice on your own. Especially if it really is cold outside, you will refuse to admit that they were right about wearing a jacket.

These mental shortcuts make your mind susceptible to receiving and believing distorted information, causing you to make decisions that aren’t always beneficial. The sunk cost fallacy is another effect of cognitive biases because it makes you irrationally cling to things that have already cost you something. If you have run a business for many years that is now going bankrupt, for example, you will not want to sell it because you have put so much money, time, and effort into it. This bias highlights the desire to hold onto something that you have put time and effort into, even though it is no longer relevant or beneficial.

A distorted perception of reality is when someone’s view or interpretation of the world is skewed, which is exhibited by irrational thought patterns. The biases associated with this are declinism and the self-serving bias. They both touch on how things can easily affect our perception and judgment to make room for misinterpretation of things happening in the world. If you believe that earning a good score on your test is due to studying hard, for example, but when you fail, it is because the teacher put hard questions on the test, then you are a victim of the self-serving bias. The self-serving bias is when you believe that your failures are due to external factors, yet you’re personally responsible for your success. This skews the perception of reality and romanticizes your past accomplishments, thus making you less accountable for your mistakes. It makes you unable to take criticism because you believe that it will not be beneficial to you, and your mistakes are not your own. Judging others comes easy when you don’t know the circumstances, but you give yourself leeway because you know what is going on and your thought process. This creates overconfident people who believe they are always right and are never wrong because their mistakes are not their fault.

People who are stuck in the past, always hoping that life will go back to how it was in the past, are subject to declinism. Declinism is when you remember the past as better than it was, and expect the future to be worse than evidence suggests it will be. But in reality, the past isn’t as good as you remember; it is just your mind believing that because you don’t want to experience life in the world you live in now. We believe the past to be better than reality because we are handpicking the good memories to remember, and blocking out the bad ones. The reason reality is not favored is that we are now living through the good and the bad events happening at the same time. Being stuck in the past will change how you view the present world because you will be resistant to change, and want to continue to see the past world through “rose colored glasses.” 

Cognitive biases are the root of systematic errors in thinking that are illustrated through flawed judgment, poor decision-making, and the distortion of the perception of reality. There are so many biases that highlight the errors of the thought process that the human mind uses to formulate a conclusion. Being aware of cognitive biases is beneficial because it will help you make better life choices as well as educate you on how to form rational judgments. But even with this knowledge, you may still make mistakes and struggle with judgment. Also, knowing the cognitive biases isn’t the most important part; being able to see and apply them to your life is what really matters. If you are not aware of your own actions and problems, then there is no way that you can reflect and fix them.

There are many more cognitive biases that I didn’t mention in this article. If you want to know more, go to https://yourbias.is/ And if you like this article, then make sure to read my next one on the Danger of Logical Fallacies next month!

Universal Studios vs. Walt Disney World: Which is Better?

By: Michael DeLuca, ’29

Staff Writer

Universal Studios Florida and Walt Disney World Florida are two of the most famous and most visited theme parks in the world. Both are so committed to their themes that, from the moment you take your first step in, you are transported to an otherworldly place. The rides are the best in the world, with outstanding themes that can make you feel like you aren’t really on earth, but rather flying through the galaxy in the Millennium Falcon, traveling through NewYork City with Spiderman, or flying on the back of a banshee in Pandora – the list goes on. Because these two theme parks are so amazing, it brings up the question: which is better?

Deciding on which theme park is better usually takes some personal preference. If you are a Harry Potter and Marvel fan, well, then Universal Studios will obviously be your favorite. But if you’re a Star Wars enthusiast or love Avatar, then Disney will obviously be your choice. Other things that you may take into account are whether you like intense thrill rides, slow moving rides, or maybe even nostalgia. For this article, I will focus only on the regular parks with normal rides, not the water parks at each resort. I will judge which theme park is better based on the following: rides, family friendliness, and fast passes (Express Pass and Lightning Lane).

Rides

The reason most people travel from all around the world to go to these theme parks is for the rides. The rides are not just your ordinary roller coaster or spinning rides that you’d see in a fairground, but one-of-a-kind works of art. In fact, both theme parks spend years designing rides to make sure they are worth every penny.

The rides at Universal Studios are often much more intense and thrilling than the rides at Disney, including five large roller coasters: The Velocicoaster, The Hulk, The Hollywood Rip Ride Rocket, Hagrid’s Motorbike Adventure, and the new Stardust Racers. These roller coasters are fun, fast, and exhilarating. In fact, the Velocicoaster is the fastest ride in Florida, reaching 72 miles per hour. However, if crazy fast roller coasters aren’t really your thing, Universal also has about 15 screen-based rides. Although many of these are very well made, there are some downsides such as possible motion sickness and need of refurbishment for outdated rides like Fast and Furious Supercharged and The Simpsons Ride. Additionally, Universal has three exceptional water rides to offer: Dudley Do-Rights, Popeye and Blutos, and Jurassic Park River Adventure. Despite the limited options for water rides, these are great for getting you drenched and offering relief from the blazing Florida sun. Overall, Universal Studios has some very enjoyable rides, and while it doesn’t have as many as Disney, most of the Universal theme park rides are unique and offer a one-of-a-kind experience for its guests. 

Disney World also has some amazing rides. In fact, some say they are the best in the country. If you are looking for fast roller coasters similar to the ones at Universal, then you will be happy to know that Disney also has a number of high speed roller coasters, although they only have one ride (Rockin’ Roller Coaster starring Aerosmith) that goes upside down. Disney does not have nearly as many screen-based rides as Universal, but that may actually be better, considering the fact that many people prefer animatronics and real props over screens. While the screens are captivating, most people would rather go on a ride where you see two life sized AT-ATs from Star Wars than see a dragon from Harry Potter on a screen. That being said, Disney does have two screen rides that are a very different style than the ones at Universal: Avatar Flight of Passage and Soarin’ Around the World. In these rides, passengers are seated directly in front of the screen, allowing them to feel like they’re really flying. Another difference between the parks is that Disney has more slower moving rides, which can be just as amazing for visitors as a big roller coaster or screen-based ride. Attractions like Pirates of the Caribbean, Haunted Mansion, and Navi River Journey are great if you want a nice, slow moving ride that makes you feel like you’re in a whole new world. Additionally, Disney has four water rides to help you cool off from the Florida sun: Pirates of the Caribbean, Frozen Ever After, Tiana’s Bayou Adventure, and Kali River Rapids. However, in terms of water rides, Universal is the clear winner, as they get you significantly more drenched than those at Disney. Like Universal, Disney also has some rides that are outdated, but Disney doesn’t feel the need to get rid of them because they are so nostalgic and iconic to the parks. 

Overall, both Universal Studios and Walt Disney world have so many amazing rides that are worth coming from all across the world to see, but based on the information above it is clear that Disney has slightly better rides. Due to it’s great moderation of rides, and that their rides are just slightly better, Disney wins the rides category.     

Family Friendliness

An important factor to consider when planning a trip is how the vacation spot will appeal to the entire family. Universal Studios has a lot more rides intended for teens and young adults, with intense rides like Velocicoaster and Escape from Gringotts, which are not really made for young kids. Universal does have a decent amount of attractions for younger riders, but not as many as a family with young kids might want. Families looking only to ride the attractions catered towards younger kids would definitely be repeating rides multiple times over their trip. Universal does offer a much easier system for navigating the parks, and has a much shorter walking distance from the deluxe hotels to the parks, making hotel access and breaks from the park much easier.

In contrast, Disney World definitely has a lot more rides intended for younger children. Disney offers slow moving rides for very young kids, and fast kid-friendly roller coasters for those who may be too young to ride huge roller coasters like Expedition Everest. Although Disney is more difficult to navigate than Universal, and not as easy to get from hotel to park, Disney also offers so much more for families. Disney has amazing shows that are super entertaining for children, incredible fireworks shows every night, parades, and meet and greets.  In conclusion, it is clear that Walt Disney World is the more family friendly theme park, therefore it wins this category.  

Fast Pass

As you can probably imagine, super popular rides at these parks can sometimes have lines that last hours, which is why it is crucial for these parks to have fast passes – a pass that you pay extra money for that gets you into a different line that moves a lot faster than the normal one. At Universal these are called “Express Passes.” You can obtain purchase these separately, or they come for free if you stay at one of the three deluxe hotels. The Express Pass works like this: you walk up to any ride, they scan your Express Pass, and you’re allowed into the express line, that simple! There are only a few rides that do not accept Express Passes, but the majority do. Disney, on the other hand, has a much more complex system. Disney’s fast passes are called “Lightning Lanes” and they can only be obtained via purchase. Lightning Lanes have a tier system where some rides are tier one and others are tier two (Animal Kingdom does not have any tiers). You can book two tier two rides and one tier one ride. After you have ridden a ride you had a Lightning Lane for, you can go on the app and book another ride, although you can only do those that are available. Disney also has a select few rides that do not accept Lightning Lanes. As you can see, Universal’s system is a lot easier to navigate and obtain, which is why they will be winning this final category.

The winner?

In conclusion, Universal only won the “fast pass” category, while Disney won two categories: the “rides” and “family friendliness,” therefore Disney is the better of the two parks in my opinion. Don’t get me wrong, both of these theme parks are amazing in their own ways and both will be an incredibly fun vacation. But when you put them head to head, Walt Disney World is slightly better.  

Spotlight on Our Stars in Annual Cabaret

By Billy Hersey and Samuel Frattasio, ’27

Editor in Chief and News Editor

The music department’s annual Cabaret, held Oct. 14, showcased performances from the school’s best and brightest. Students from all grades sang, played in ensembles created just for the event, and even performed stand-up comedy. These photos capture just a glimpse of the night. While not everyone could be featured, it was truly an evening to remember, and every performer earned the title of “star.”

Members of the Tri-M Music Honor Society worked with Mr. Harden, our band director, and Mr. Wade, our choral director, to set up the event and keep the night running smoothly.

Gen-Z Nepal’s War on Censorship

By Avery Bridson, ’27

News Editor 

Gen Z is considered by many to be the first to grow up on social media. Born from the mid-90s to early 2010s, this generation consumes more content each day than any other. When the government of Nepal tried to ban 26 major social media platforms, the young adults of the country did not sit by quietly. They took to the streets to protest what they called censorship and authoritarian rule.

The government of Nepal made the decision to ban the social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, in September. The ban was implemented after the app owners refused to comply with the request to register with the Nepali government and limit information.  Officials argued that the move was about ‘sovereignty and regulation,’ not censorship, but the citizens thought differently. They felt that their democracy and freedom of expression were just temporary privileges. This led to protesters peacefully gathering to argue against the government’s decision. However, it quickly escalated to violence and destruction.  

On September 8, police shot at the protesters near the Parliament building, causing at least 19 deaths, including a 12-year-old child, and over 100 injuries. The next day, thousands of young protesters stormed the parliament building. They destroyed the interior, ransacking valuables and setting rooms on fire. The prime minister’s house was also set on fire, leading to his resignation. The power vacuum was filled by Sushila Karki, Nepal’s first female prime minister, who holds a zero-tolerance policy on government corruption and political censorship. The social media ban and national curfew were lifted shortly after, with Karki pledging to end corruption and respond to the demands of the people.

This issue is not unique to developing countries like Nepal. Recently in Mexico, thousands of members of Gen Z organized through social media in massive protests against crime and corruption. Similar protests have occurred in the past two years from Bangladesh and Kenya to Italy and Peru. For students anywhere, this story demonstrates how youth activism online can translate into political change for the better.