By Billy Hersey, ’27

Staff Writer

I didn’t have high hopes for Wish, Disney’s latest animated film, mainly because of the negative press around it. After watching it, I can say that while it’s far from Disney’s best, it isn’t awful. The film’s message and soundtrack make it worth watching, at least if you’re a fan of Disney.

The creators wanted to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Disney and the company’s legacy, so they designed a whole new art style combining methods from the classics like Pinocchio and Snow White, but also using present-day technology. They wanted to prevent the film from feeling old while paying homage to the many films made through the years. Being so used to the recent animation style of films like Moana, I was originally surprised and skeptical of the art in Wish, finding it a little “off.” But after seeing the making of the movie and learning more about the creators’ vision, I started to understand and found the new style a nice change of scenery. 

This aspiration to honor Disney’s many classics led the filmmakers to include references or nods throughout the film. Some say there were too many “Easter eggs,” and in some cases I agree. But the nods also remind viewers of their favorite films and add to their appreciation, which I feel is just what the architects of the movie wanted. 

Critics of Wish have said that the plot is basic and the movie is too fast paced, and I have to agree. I feel there was a need for more character development which could have slowed the movie and made the writing and story more complex. Some also longed for the classic Disney villain and felt the “bad guy” in Wish was barely evil and his reasons for turning evil were valid. I also felt the villain was missing something and I feel that adding more background especially with the father would have been nice especially since the filmmakers are trying to show he and Asha, the main character, had a close relationship. We barely know anything about Asha’s friends or how they met, especially Dahlia, who she seems closest to. I think perhaps the film could have benefitted from more of a background behind their friendship especially when thinking about all the things Dahlia did for Asha and the trust they have for each other.

Since this is a movie whose intended audience is mainly children, there were many reviews from adults seeing it with their young children and loving it. A simple story that is easy to follow is probably better for kids who may not be able to follow a more complex plot preferred by adult viewers. Lots of people love the character Star, who has lots of personality and a strong connection with Asha even though he doesn’t speak. But they noted the missed opportunity to add more after reading or hearing about the different ideas that arose during the character’s development.

One thing that really added to the film was the creative and beautiful soundtrack, especially the song “This Wish” because of its hopeful lyrics and sound. Something else that redeems the movie’s flaws is its theme. The creators try to convey to viewers that it is never too late to try to make a dream come true, and that if you want your wishes to come true, you have to work for them.

While this is far from my favorite movie, I would recommend that Disney fans watch it at least once to experience the beautiful art, hear the songs and feel the message. The movie has its issues, but I feel its goal to celebrate a century of classics created by the company has been achieved.

By Siena Oliver, ’27

Staff Writer

In English class the last two years, I’ve read 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. These two books were published four years apart in 1949 and 1953 respectively. They are both cautionary tales about the future, the use of technology, and mass censorship of a society that seems not to care that they are being manipulated.  Both books are extremely important in the literary world, but I found Fahrenheit far more enjoyable to read.

Both books follow men living in dystopian societies, who eventually start to question their ways. The protagonist of 1984, Winston, begins his story working at the “Ministry of Truth” where his job is to edit and censor all types of media and information, essentially changing history. Montag, from Fahrenheit 451, works as a fireman who burns books, which is another form of censorship. Both of these characters work in respected jobs for the government and actively take part in changing the information that is given to the public. At some point in both of the books, the protagonists each have a revelation about how they cannot stand to live under the rule of an all-powerful government that so blatantly controls the information they receive. Winston and Montag both end up rebelling, and in doing so make connections with people they otherwise would not have.  

Although the books are fairly similar in terms of content and meaning, I personally disliked 1984 but enjoyed Fahrenheit 451. In my opinion, 1984 was too long and often seemed to drone on with unnecessary and boring information, while Fahrenheit 451 was a fairly fast-paced and short read that held my attention throughout the entire story.  I found the authors’ writing styles to be a bit wordy and confusing at times, often sounding sort of like poetry. This can be a good thing or a bad thing depending on the length and excitement of the book. As a reader, I dislike stopping books in the middle, but with 1984, I nearly did because it was so hard for me to get through. 

By Sienna Lamond, ’26

Staff Writer

Like jazz was born in Louisiana, reggae was born in Jamaica; and just like jazz had stars such as Louis Armstrong, reggae had Bob Marley. A biopic called One Love about Marley was recently released in theaters. The highly anticipated film was preceded by a clip of Marley’s son, Ziggy Marley, who also works in the music industry, giving a statement on how proud the family was of this film. As I watched, though, I couldn’t help but feel like the movie was a disservice to Marley. The set design, costumes, and actors were all perfectly suited to the story, but the entire movie only captured two years of Marley’s life, accomplishments, and legacy (1976–1978). I feel that the movie failed to encapsulate just how great and impressive Bob Marley truly was and what he did, not only for music but for peace.

Bob Marley was born on February 6, 1945, the same year that World War II ended. For almost the entirety of Marley’s childhood, Jamaica was a piece of the British Empire. In 1962, Jamaica was granted independence as a nation but maintained its status as part of the British Commonwealth. However, political unrest still plagued the country. Tensions between two large political groups, the Jamaican Labor Party (JLP) and the People’s National Party (PNP), resulted in violence and danger throughout the country. 

Marley utilized his musical skills to speak on political topics, the most famous instance of which is the “One Love Peace Concert” held in Kingston, Jamaica in 1978. This is one of the most important highlights of his career, which thankfully the movie includes. Here, Marley stood as a symbol of unity as he clasped the hands of the PNP and JLP leaders, Michael Manley and Edward Seaga, in front of the roaring crowd. Marley sought more than an end to violence; he sought the betterment of his home country. Through songs like “War,” “Slave Driver,” “One Love,” “Get Up, Stand Up,” “Rebel Music,” and “Concrete Jungle,” he literally and metaphorically uses his voice and platform to provide the Jamaican people — and people globally — a sense of hope that the fight for peace will be heard and not silenced. 

To fully appreciate the mysticism of the legendary Bob Marley, one must understand the sociopolitical climate at the time he delivered his message to the world. The movie touches on the political unrest and violence in Jamaica, but Marley’s music had global implications wherever political unrest and unjust social structures existed. In his lyrics, “Rasta don’t work for no CIA,” it’s evident that Marley’s music was viewed as a pivotal motivator in elections and, thus, was threatening to various political regimes. Whether it be Cuba, Africa, or Chile, his music was viewed as destabilizing to the established structure. Ironically, Marley’s power came from remaining politically neutral even as his reach expanded globally. Despite assassination attempts and pressure from multiple sides, Marley never wavered from his philosophy: “Live for yourself, and you will live in vain. Live for others, and you will live again,” and that love is stronger than fear, hate, and violence. The movie could have included more examples of him as a symbol of peace, such as his music playing as the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 and its impact on civil rights worldwide. 

The few scenes that touched on his musical journey and the development of his songs seemed oddly placed to me. The drum circle scene does well to portray his Rasta roots and shed light on the spiritual nature of his music; however, I would have preferred a more chronological journey to understand and appreciate his early music that led to him ultimately creating his greatest hits and the sound that the world recognizes him for. I would have also liked to see the movie shed light on Marley’s legacy. Despite passing at the early age of 36 to cancer —which is another unclear aspect of the film—he had a tremendous impact on popularizing reggae music worldwide. Music tends to set the tone for an era. Think of the U.S. in the 1940s, being focused on classic stars like Frank Sinatra and Ella Fitzgerald, but then in the 50s, Elvis and Rock n’ Roll came to popularity, challenging the conformist norms of the decade. Reggae was the rock n’ roll of the 1970s. It was new and therefore alluring to younger folk, raising a generation focused on its message of peace and love. Many of Marley’s associates continued his musical journey. Others, from Eric Claypton to Lauren Hill, covered his songs. His children have had illustrious musical careers as well, such as the aforementioned Ziggy Marley, who released songs such as “Love is My Religion” and “True to Myself,”  carrying on his father’s legacy and message. His grandson (and Rohan Marley and Lauren Hill’s son), YG Marley, has recently come out with a modern reggae song called “Praise Jah in the Moonlight,” which has gained popularity through social media, namely TikTok. 

Overall, the movie does well to introduce us to Bob Marley, the man, but I attest that he deserved even more. A man whose music and message reverberate through the ages deserves more than an hour and 45-minute biopic covering two years of his life. A legend of his status deserves an epic film capturing all his trials and tribulations and the lessons he learns while overcoming them. Marley teaches the world that no matter what dire circumstance confronts you, there is love, hope, and belief in a brighter tomorrow, and he does so brilliantly through his music. I hope this is not the end of Marley’s tributes; as he says himself, “in this bright future, you can’t forget the past,” because acknowledging fault is how we progress and do better for ourselves and the world in the future.