By Billy Hersey, ’27

Staff Writer

I didn’t have high hopes for Wish, Disney’s latest animated film, mainly because of the negative press around it. After watching it, I can say that while it’s far from Disney’s best, it isn’t awful. The film’s message and soundtrack make it worth watching, at least if you’re a fan of Disney.

The creators wanted to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Disney and the company’s legacy, so they designed a whole new art style combining methods from the classics like Pinocchio and Snow White, but also using present-day technology. They wanted to prevent the film from feeling old while paying homage to the many films made through the years. Being so used to the recent animation style of films like Moana, I was originally surprised and skeptical of the art in Wish, finding it a little “off.” But after seeing the making of the movie and learning more about the creators’ vision, I started to understand and found the new style a nice change of scenery. 

This aspiration to honor Disney’s many classics led the filmmakers to include references or nods throughout the film. Some say there were too many “Easter eggs,” and in some cases I agree. But the nods also remind viewers of their favorite films and add to their appreciation, which I feel is just what the architects of the movie wanted. 

Critics of Wish have said that the plot is basic and the movie is too fast paced, and I have to agree. I feel there was a need for more character development which could have slowed the movie and made the writing and story more complex. Some also longed for the classic Disney villain and felt the “bad guy” in Wish was barely evil and his reasons for turning evil were valid. I also felt the villain was missing something and I feel that adding more background especially with the father would have been nice especially since the filmmakers are trying to show he and Asha, the main character, had a close relationship. We barely know anything about Asha’s friends or how they met, especially Dahlia, who she seems closest to. I think perhaps the film could have benefitted from more of a background behind their friendship especially when thinking about all the things Dahlia did for Asha and the trust they have for each other.

Since this is a movie whose intended audience is mainly children, there were many reviews from adults seeing it with their young children and loving it. A simple story that is easy to follow is probably better for kids who may not be able to follow a more complex plot preferred by adult viewers. Lots of people love the character Star, who has lots of personality and a strong connection with Asha even though he doesn’t speak. But they noted the missed opportunity to add more after reading or hearing about the different ideas that arose during the character’s development.

One thing that really added to the film was the creative and beautiful soundtrack, especially the song “This Wish” because of its hopeful lyrics and sound. Something else that redeems the movie’s flaws is its theme. The creators try to convey to viewers that it is never too late to try to make a dream come true, and that if you want your wishes to come true, you have to work for them.

While this is far from my favorite movie, I would recommend that Disney fans watch it at least once to experience the beautiful art, hear the songs and feel the message. The movie has its issues, but I feel its goal to celebrate a century of classics created by the company has been achieved.

By Siena Oliver, ’27

Staff Writer

In English class the last two years, I’ve read 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. These two books were published four years apart in 1949 and 1953 respectively. They are both cautionary tales about the future, the use of technology, and mass censorship of a society that seems not to care that they are being manipulated.  Both books are extremely important in the literary world, but I found Fahrenheit far more enjoyable to read.

Both books follow men living in dystopian societies, who eventually start to question their ways. The protagonist of 1984, Winston, begins his story working at the “Ministry of Truth” where his job is to edit and censor all types of media and information, essentially changing history. Montag, from Fahrenheit 451, works as a fireman who burns books, which is another form of censorship. Both of these characters work in respected jobs for the government and actively take part in changing the information that is given to the public. At some point in both of the books, the protagonists each have a revelation about how they cannot stand to live under the rule of an all-powerful government that so blatantly controls the information they receive. Winston and Montag both end up rebelling, and in doing so make connections with people they otherwise would not have.  

Although the books are fairly similar in terms of content and meaning, I personally disliked 1984 but enjoyed Fahrenheit 451. In my opinion, 1984 was too long and often seemed to drone on with unnecessary and boring information, while Fahrenheit 451 was a fairly fast-paced and short read that held my attention throughout the entire story.  I found the authors’ writing styles to be a bit wordy and confusing at times, often sounding sort of like poetry. This can be a good thing or a bad thing depending on the length and excitement of the book. As a reader, I dislike stopping books in the middle, but with 1984, I nearly did because it was so hard for me to get through. 

By Sienna Lamond, ’26

Staff Writer

Like jazz was born in Louisiana, reggae was born in Jamaica; and just like jazz had stars such as Louis Armstrong, reggae had Bob Marley. A biopic called One Love about Marley was recently released in theaters. The highly anticipated film was preceded by a clip of Marley’s son, Ziggy Marley, who also works in the music industry, giving a statement on how proud the family was of this film. As I watched, though, I couldn’t help but feel like the movie was a disservice to Marley. The set design, costumes, and actors were all perfectly suited to the story, but the entire movie only captured two years of Marley’s life, accomplishments, and legacy (1976–1978). I feel that the movie failed to encapsulate just how great and impressive Bob Marley truly was and what he did, not only for music but for peace.

Bob Marley was born on February 6, 1945, the same year that World War II ended. For almost the entirety of Marley’s childhood, Jamaica was a piece of the British Empire. In 1962, Jamaica was granted independence as a nation but maintained its status as part of the British Commonwealth. However, political unrest still plagued the country. Tensions between two large political groups, the Jamaican Labor Party (JLP) and the People’s National Party (PNP), resulted in violence and danger throughout the country. 

Marley utilized his musical skills to speak on political topics, the most famous instance of which is the “One Love Peace Concert” held in Kingston, Jamaica in 1978. This is one of the most important highlights of his career, which thankfully the movie includes. Here, Marley stood as a symbol of unity as he clasped the hands of the PNP and JLP leaders, Michael Manley and Edward Seaga, in front of the roaring crowd. Marley sought more than an end to violence; he sought the betterment of his home country. Through songs like “War,” “Slave Driver,” “One Love,” “Get Up, Stand Up,” “Rebel Music,” and “Concrete Jungle,” he literally and metaphorically uses his voice and platform to provide the Jamaican people — and people globally — a sense of hope that the fight for peace will be heard and not silenced. 

To fully appreciate the mysticism of the legendary Bob Marley, one must understand the sociopolitical climate at the time he delivered his message to the world. The movie touches on the political unrest and violence in Jamaica, but Marley’s music had global implications wherever political unrest and unjust social structures existed. In his lyrics, “Rasta don’t work for no CIA,” it’s evident that Marley’s music was viewed as a pivotal motivator in elections and, thus, was threatening to various political regimes. Whether it be Cuba, Africa, or Chile, his music was viewed as destabilizing to the established structure. Ironically, Marley’s power came from remaining politically neutral even as his reach expanded globally. Despite assassination attempts and pressure from multiple sides, Marley never wavered from his philosophy: “Live for yourself, and you will live in vain. Live for others, and you will live again,” and that love is stronger than fear, hate, and violence. The movie could have included more examples of him as a symbol of peace, such as his music playing as the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 and its impact on civil rights worldwide. 

The few scenes that touched on his musical journey and the development of his songs seemed oddly placed to me. The drum circle scene does well to portray his Rasta roots and shed light on the spiritual nature of his music; however, I would have preferred a more chronological journey to understand and appreciate his early music that led to him ultimately creating his greatest hits and the sound that the world recognizes him for. I would have also liked to see the movie shed light on Marley’s legacy. Despite passing at the early age of 36 to cancer —which is another unclear aspect of the film—he had a tremendous impact on popularizing reggae music worldwide. Music tends to set the tone for an era. Think of the U.S. in the 1940s, being focused on classic stars like Frank Sinatra and Ella Fitzgerald, but then in the 50s, Elvis and Rock n’ Roll came to popularity, challenging the conformist norms of the decade. Reggae was the rock n’ roll of the 1970s. It was new and therefore alluring to younger folk, raising a generation focused on its message of peace and love. Many of Marley’s associates continued his musical journey. Others, from Eric Claypton to Lauren Hill, covered his songs. His children have had illustrious musical careers as well, such as the aforementioned Ziggy Marley, who released songs such as “Love is My Religion” and “True to Myself,”  carrying on his father’s legacy and message. His grandson (and Rohan Marley and Lauren Hill’s son), YG Marley, has recently come out with a modern reggae song called “Praise Jah in the Moonlight,” which has gained popularity through social media, namely TikTok. 

Overall, the movie does well to introduce us to Bob Marley, the man, but I attest that he deserved even more. A man whose music and message reverberate through the ages deserves more than an hour and 45-minute biopic covering two years of his life. A legend of his status deserves an epic film capturing all his trials and tribulations and the lessons he learns while overcoming them. Marley teaches the world that no matter what dire circumstance confronts you, there is love, hope, and belief in a brighter tomorrow, and he does so brilliantly through his music. I hope this is not the end of Marley’s tributes; as he says himself, “in this bright future, you can’t forget the past,” because acknowledging fault is how we progress and do better for ourselves and the world in the future.

By Bradlee Dowling, ’26

Staff Writer

Step into the hallowed halls of Sephora, and you’ll find more than just shelves ransacked of beauty products – you’ll stumble upon a spectacle that defies imagination. What was once a sanctuary for makeup mavens of all ages has now morphed into a playground for the pint-sized, where chaos reigns supreme and the rules of etiquette are but a distant memory.

“People say the store looks like an elementary school for the beauty-obsessed 10-year-olds, some of whom have been caught treating employees poorly and destroying displays,” mocked Katie Camaro in a Jan. 29 article from USA Today, eyes wide with disbelief as she bore witness to the pandemonium that has taken root within Sephora’s walls. Indeed, what unfolds before them is a scene straight out of a twisted fairytale – a fairytale where tween queens tower above, armed with mascara wands and lip gloss scepters.

Imagine, if you will, a troop of tweens descending upon the aisles like a swarm of locusts, their eyes alight with the fervor of discovery and desire. But instead of gentle exploration and whispered inquiries, their approach is anything but subtle. With reckless abandon, they snatch at samples, leaving a trail of destruction in their wake as they wreak havoc upon displays and unleash turmoil upon the nerves of troubled Sephora staff.

Yet, it’s not just the chaos and discord that raises eyebrows – it’s the alarming trend of tweens purchasing products better suited to seasoned skincare veterans than fresh-faced adolescents. “A bigger concern for many is pre-adolescents obsessing over beauty products traditionally marketed to women and older teens, including exfoliators and anti-aging products with retinol that may be too harsh for pre-teens’ skin,” said Tom Ryan in a Jan. 31 article in Retail Wire. Indeed, wandering through the aisles of Sephora, one can’t help but notice the potent potions and elixirs, tempting young patrons with promises of flawless skin and eternal youth.

From retinol-infused creams to potent exfoliators, these young beauty devotees are unwittingly playing Russian roulette with their delicate complexions. “Preteens are bombarded with influencer-sponsored advertisements and step-by-step tutorials for makeup and skincare products unlike generations past,” Ryan continued in Retail Wire. In their quest for TikTok-worthy perfection, they’re sacrificing more than just their pocket money – they’re trading innocence for the fleeting promise of beauty, unaware of the potential long-term effects on their still-developing skin.

As Sephora transforms into a playground, the stakes have never been higher. It’s not just about the products lining the shelves or the chaos unfolding in the aisles – it’s about the future of an entire generation, grappling with unprecedented levels of anxiety and self-esteem issues. As one can’t help but wonder, what price are we willing to pay for the pursuit of perfection?

But amidst the madness lies a glimmer of hope – an opportunity to educate and empower the next generation of beauty enthusiasts. By promoting a culture of kindness, respect, and self-acceptance, Sephora can reclaim its status as a sanctuary for all – regardless of age or experience. For beauty knows no bounds, and neither should our compassion.

By Owen Pierotti, ’27

Staff Writer

Gypsy Rose Blanchard, whose story capitivated us after a 2017 HBO documentary called Mommy Dead and Dearest, is out of prison and now a survivor of a rare mental illness called Munchausen syndrome by proxy. But has she gotten the help she needs to ensure she’s no longer a danger to society?

According to Medline Plus, Munchausen by proxy is a form of child abuse where a parent fakes an illness or causes symptoms to make a child appear sick. Gypsy suffered years of unnecessary medical treatments for sleep apnea, leukemia and more due to her mother, Claudine “Dee Dee” Blanchard. Gypsy was confined to a wheelchair and isolated from others and her mother even lied about her age to make her seem younger and more fragile. Eventually, Gypsy started going behind her mother’s back to talk to people outside of her sheltered life. She learned she didn’t need the wheelchair and began to disobey Deedee. Still, she was confused by her mother’s behavior and scared to tell anyone she wasn’t sick. 

Feeling stuck, Gypsy met a quirky and weird boy on an online dating site. Nicholas Giddejohn called Gypsy his “princess” and promised to do anything for her. That ultimately included killing Gypsy’s mother, who was stabbed to death in June 2015. Gypsy and Nicholas were soon arrested and put on trial. Nicholas was sentenced to life in prison while Gypsy was sentenced to ten years. Last December, Gypsy was released after serving 8.5 years.

Since leaving prison, Gypsy has moved to Louisiana with Ryan Anderson, who she married while behind bars. She’s gone viral on social media and has been featured on interview after interview. Gypsy is now an activist for Munchausen by proxy, and is speaking out about her experience. The media has been surprisingly forgiving. I think Gypsy needs to focus on her mental health before she can help others. If she doesn’t get help, the abuse inflicted by Dee Dee could still linger. What if Gypsy abuses her own child like Dee Dee did? 

This is surely not the end of Gypsy’s story. I hope it can be the advent of a new happy and healthy life if she focuses less on the spotlight and more on healing herself.

By Sienna Lamond, ’26

Staff Writer

For years there’s been this stereotype of the “mean girl” at every high school – it’s expected that there is a female monarch, but why? Why is there an unspoken election of these Queen Bees? Why do they get to be mean to people, yet stay so respected? Why do adolescents fear their peers? Is there a price to pay for being nice, and furthermore, is there a benefit to being mean?

One of the most iconic chick flicks of the early 2000s highlights the mean girl clique in a unique and relatable way. Tina Fey’s 2004 Mean Girls, now in theaters as a musical, features a girl named Cady moving to a small town in Illinois from her previous home in Kenya. Cady’s parents are biologists that study animal behavior, which is told to the audience early on in the movie, but is a relevant detail that carries throughout. As Cady, portrayed by Lindsey Lohan, navigates her new high school, she finds that it isn’t too different from her old life in Kenya. She recognizes that Regina George, the designated Queen Bee, represents the apex predator, the animal at the top of the food chain with nothing capable of tearing it down, and all the other kids in school are her subjects, the smaller and lesser members of the animal kingdom.

The plastics, consisting of Regina and her two best friends, Gretchen Weiners and Karen Smith, operate much like a pack of lions or lionesses. The analogy of a high school to African wildlife represents the primeval nature of the social hierarchy. As an article published in Irishnews.com states, “not only do all human teenagers share similar characteristics, but their typical adolescent behavior is reflected throughout the animal kingdom in creatures as small as insects to as large as whales.” The article then proceeds to break down the similarities into four categories, one of them being social status. Irishnews.com writes that, “In animal hierarchies, high status individuals eat more, live in safer places and reproduce more. They even have stronger immune systems and get better sleep” which helps to show why social status inherently matters so much to high school students. It’s part of our innate behavior to want to be on top because of all the benefits it provides, and if you can’t be number one, being close enough to that MVP also allows for these perks. 

Of course, Mean Girls is loved by all for its iconic script, fantastic actors, killer soundtrack, and classic costumes, but what many didn’t realize then and don’t realize now is that the movie is based on a Rosalind Wiseman book titled Queen Bees and Wannabes which is a guidebook for high schoolers, specifically girls. Though this book is devoted to helping teenage girls, it also exposes some taboos of the social structure. It challenges girls, but also adults, to recognize the deeper meanings behind the actions, reactions, and inactions of their peers. The book illustrates a box of characteristics and traits. The qualities inside the box (beauty, athleticism, confidence, right clothing brands, pretty by the guys standard, etc.) are what determines a girl’s popularity while the exterior qualities (overweight, acne, overly-masculine, financial difficulty, etc.) are often present in social outcasts. Wiseman then explains that, “… the words outside of the box. These are weapons. … Cliques are self-reinforcing.” Girls choose to be bystanders when they see bullying occur because standing up to the popular clique would make them stand out enough to be categorized as outside-of-the-box, and being inside-of-the-box provides a sense of social security.

All humans, according to Sigmund Freud’s legendary research and theory of personality,  initiate defense mechanisms in an effort to protect themselves. Whether a teen is insecure about their body, grades, social status, financial situation, or home life, all are reasons for projection. This means that negative attributes they see in themselves, they often assign to others as a way to cope. A girl may make fun of another girl’s hair if she’s insecure about how her hair looks, and that will make her feel better. For those who cannot identify these mechanisms in action so easily, this will appear as if the girl is truly being mean. Obviously, it’s not nice to call someone’s hair scraggly, but if that person believes that their own hair also looks scraggly, then it makes more sense and the attack is not without reason or purpose. Being mean just to be mean is not a common occurrence. More often than not, one can find a motive behind most verbal attacks.

However, verbal attacks and “gossip [are] like money,” says 16-year-old Jane, one of the teens interviewed in Wiseman’s book. “We exchange it, sell it, and lend it out. It’s what we have of value.” Ideas expressed through gossip can be interpreted as mean and unwarranted statements. There is a big difference between trying to be mean and inadvertently saying things that are mean. We have to be able to discern between what is malicious and what is benign based on the circumstances we are told things. People often say mean and damaging things about other people without even realizing, partly because they don’t think what they say will ever reach the person they’re talking about, but also because they don’t view what they are saying as mean in the first place. When engaged in a conversation about someone else it is important to know the information you say could end up being shared with that person. 

Sometimes people just don’t have anything else to talk about, so they resort to gossiping to keep a conversation going, which, unbeknownst to them, is actively contributing to the spread of rumors and negativity. Gossip is one of the quickest ways mean comments are spread around. So why do we gossip? Well, uninteresting people make up for it by talking about other people to make themselves appear more interesting, and also to make them seem of higher value to the people who “matter” to them. In most social situations, like at work, at the gym, at the salon, and at school, gossip is power. Gossip may not be intended to be mean, but it almost always comes across that way, so it’s important to be mindful of who you’re talking about, and with who.

So, do people really want to be mean? No, not really. Most people don’t even realize they’re being mean even when they are. When they do make a targeted comment, it’s often a reflection of their own insecurities. The most important takeaway from the movie, as well as the book it’s based on, is that putting down others doesn’t lift you up. “Calling someone else fat won’t make you any skinnier,” says Cady. “Calling someone stupid doesn’t make you any smarter. And ruining Regina George’s life definitely didn’t make me any happier.” More often than not, it’s the girls that call you mean who are trying to make up for their own lack of kindness. In the words of the beloved beauty icon, Audrey Hepburn,  “for beautiful lips, speak only words of kindness” for no physical beauty can compare to a kind heart and compassionate smile.